Yesterday, Caleb Campbell was one day away from beginning his dream of becoming an NFL player.
But today he is days away from another dream......joining his fellow classmates in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Campbell was drafted in the 7th round of this year's NFL Draft by the Detroit Lions. At the time it was a rule and agreed that he would be an active Army recruiter while playing in the NFL instead of completing his necessary 4 years of active duty.
Those were the terms when he was drafted.
But on July 8th the Army changed their rules. Now Campbell will have to serve 2 years of active duty and then he can ask for an early release and (possibly) become a recruiter for the final 2 years of his 4 year requirement.
Why did the Army change their policy?
Mainly because the Air Force and Navy complained. They said it would hurt their recruiting of athletes. Because they still require a graduate to fulfill his required active duty before he can begin a career in something else.
And why are the Navy and Air Force complaining anyways? How often does something like this happen?
Those two academies still had a 4 year requirement in place. And most (if not all) players that sign with service academies instead of colleges are planning on serving their 4 years of active duty. Or else they wouldn't have signed up.
And why wouldn't they change their rules instead. It seems to me that the academies would get more athletes to sign with them if they could reduce or eliminate their active duty requirements if they sign a contract with a professional sports league.
It doesn't happen often. And it would help bring in more kids who figure they are going to the be active duty military when they graduate but there is always that chance that they could be drafted into a professional sport instead.
I bet you would see more talented kids going to the service academies to play sports and become officers if there was an option for that.
Now, do I agree with the ruling by the Army?
Sure. It is fine with me. It is up to them as far as what rules are in place.
But why isn't Campbell's situation being considered under the rules that were in place when he got drafted?
He was drafted when the rule stated he could become a recruiter instead of serving overseas in active duty. So why not allow him to continue on that path and change the rule for any future situations?
Is it okay with Caleb Campbell?
Absolutely. He signed up to be in the Army and the possibility of an future in the NFL developed while he was there. And that is something he still intends to do. He can come back to the NFL in 2 years. It isn't like he is just going to be sitting on his couch watching tv for the next 2 years.
But today he is days away from another dream......joining his fellow classmates in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Campbell was drafted in the 7th round of this year's NFL Draft by the Detroit Lions. At the time it was a rule and agreed that he would be an active Army recruiter while playing in the NFL instead of completing his necessary 4 years of active duty.
Those were the terms when he was drafted.
But on July 8th the Army changed their rules. Now Campbell will have to serve 2 years of active duty and then he can ask for an early release and (possibly) become a recruiter for the final 2 years of his 4 year requirement.
Why did the Army change their policy?
Mainly because the Air Force and Navy complained. They said it would hurt their recruiting of athletes. Because they still require a graduate to fulfill his required active duty before he can begin a career in something else.
And why are the Navy and Air Force complaining anyways? How often does something like this happen?
Those two academies still had a 4 year requirement in place. And most (if not all) players that sign with service academies instead of colleges are planning on serving their 4 years of active duty. Or else they wouldn't have signed up.
And why wouldn't they change their rules instead. It seems to me that the academies would get more athletes to sign with them if they could reduce or eliminate their active duty requirements if they sign a contract with a professional sports league.
It doesn't happen often. And it would help bring in more kids who figure they are going to the be active duty military when they graduate but there is always that chance that they could be drafted into a professional sport instead.
I bet you would see more talented kids going to the service academies to play sports and become officers if there was an option for that.
Now, do I agree with the ruling by the Army?
Sure. It is fine with me. It is up to them as far as what rules are in place.
But why isn't Campbell's situation being considered under the rules that were in place when he got drafted?
He was drafted when the rule stated he could become a recruiter instead of serving overseas in active duty. So why not allow him to continue on that path and change the rule for any future situations?
Is it okay with Caleb Campbell?
Absolutely. He signed up to be in the Army and the possibility of an future in the NFL developed while he was there. And that is something he still intends to do. He can come back to the NFL in 2 years. It isn't like he is just going to be sitting on his couch watching tv for the next 2 years.
But what does this say about the decision makers at these academies that allow a rule to be in place even though they aren't going to follow it?
This just makes it look like the Army, and most government agencies, will change the rules around whenever they want to get what they want.
This does not make the Army look good.
And it surely WON'T help with recruiting!